Monthly Archives :

November 2018

150 150 Prevance - Bridging Finance South Africa

Technology has revolutionised, not replaced estate agents

Ted Frazer, national marketing manager, Seeff Property Group

The fast paced evolution of technology platforms which now provide buyers and sellers increased access to property information, and the emergence of new online platforms has forced the traditional real estate sector to re-evaluate its value proposition. This is not uncommon and we have seen it in many industries. But with the advancement of platforms where buyers and sellers can meet independently, will estate agents be phased out?

This is one of the debates currently waging in the US, where leaders are posing whether the future will see “agent-enabled tech” or “tech-enabled agents”. While technological advancement is massive in terms of getting more people to see property listings, it should be noted that property is a financially significant and legally complex transaction. It is not as easy as just listing your property online and waiting for buyers. A lot can, and often does go wrong with a property transaction. When the dust of newness settles, most sellers (and arguable many buyers) still prefer to have an agent facilitate the transaction. The opportunity here is for traditional real estate players to identify and unlock “new value” for customers. It is always exciting to be pushed out of one’s “comfort zone” and to look for new opportunities and ways to do things better and the rapid move in technological advancement evident this year, has served as a reminder of this.

Will we ever see estate agents disappear?

That is doubtful. Even in advanced real estate markets such as the USA and UK, estate agents still play a key role. Looking at certain other sectors within the broader service-industry, we have seen instances where innovation has almost, if not totally replaced the human component in the overall transaction process – a simple example would be paid parking areas, where previously, motorists needed to engage with the attendant, but now it is a very successful self-service. However, in complex service areas which involve multifaceted and financially significant transactions, such as real estate, an experienced advisor will always be required to play a role in facilitating the transaction and close the deal. Very few real estate transactions amount to a simple offer and acceptance process, there are always interactions necessary.

Technology will not remove the need for traditional real estate companies, but will force them to re-examine the way in which they operate and engage with customers. We will almost certainly see a move by real estate companies and their agents to re-evaluate their offerings to customers. Those who don’t adapt to the changing paradigm, will not survive in the long term.

Virtual and augmented reality

There are new tech innovations and improvements introduced almost monthly and business sectors overestimate the potential impact without first considering the market’s “technology readiness level” (TRL) and adoption of certain areas of tech. While augmented reality may seem like an obvious next step for the property industry, most consumers don’t use this feature and therefore don’t see the immediate value. On the other hand, communication applications such as Whatsapp has seen far more adoption and is fast becoming the preferred mode of cross-platform communication.

Seeff does not perceive technology as a threat to our business and agents, but as an opportunity. There will always be a segment of the market confident enough to manage their own property transactions on a technology platform and these offerings will therefore have some level of appeal in the market. However, much the same way as the travel agency sector had to “repackage” itself and elevate its value proposition when online revolutionised the travel industry, real estate brands such as Seeff are looking at adopting the very best tech innovations to similarly equip our agents to provide a better service experience to our clients.

We often tend to associate the term “innovation” purely with technological innovations, however, a winning real estate brand will be one that harnesses all forms of innovation – including tech – to ensure that the value proposition delivery to the client is not only met, but exceeded.

Click here to read full article 

source is

150 150 Prevance - Bridging Finance South Africa

BFASA Senior Council Opinion on ” kickbacks


The Bridging Finance Association of South Africa (“BFASA”) consulted with Senior Council, Adv. Francois van Zyl SC between June and August 2018 in order to ascertain his opinion in respect of certain aspects of bridging finance transactions and arrangements between conveyancing attorneys and the bridging finance companies and their respective clients.

What is set out in this note is a summary of his opinion which BFASA hopes will be of use to such conveyancing attorneys and the bridging finance companies and their respective clients.

Conveyancing attorney firms handle transfers of properties and other conveyancing transactions on behalf of their clients. As part of such transactions, their client may have a requirement for bridging finance specifically related to that transaction. In order to satisfy such client need, they refer the client to a bridging finance company.

There are currently various practices in the market which arise from these transactions:

  1. The Attorney Firm receives some reward from the bridging finance company for the introduction to their client;
  2. An employee of the Attorney Firm receives some reward from the bridging finance company for the introduction to their client;

The view of senior council was sought in relation to the conduct of such payments.

Adv. Van Zyl SC has the following views in respect of each scenario mentioned above:

  1. Rule 32 of the Rules for the Attorneys Profession applies.

In terms thereof, the Attorney Firm shall NOT receive such reward in whatever form unless it has been disclosed in writing to the client and obtained the client’s written consent. This may constitute a conflict of interest.


  1. Rule 32 of the Rules for the Attorneys Profession likewise applies. This applies unless the employee acts in an unauthorised manner in which scenario, this may then be a corrupt practice in terms of Section 3 of the Corruption Act.


Furthermore, it is of Council’s opinion that failure to disclose such payments or interest to a client may amount to fraud, albeit a civil fraud.

The opinion suggests that where there is such conflict of interest, the action of the Attorney should be brought to the attention of the relevant Law Society.

In view of the above, BFASA intends supplementing its Code of Conduct with a provision that reasonable written steps should be taken by a member of BFASA to ensure that Rule 32 has been complied with by the attorneys.

Read Full Opinion Here

November 2018








Head Office : 011-274-1700